The Quill and the Crowbar

Friday, April 07, 2006

Tiktaalik rosea




Here we go again. Our friends, the evolutionists can't identify this reptile/fish thing they say they've found. It's probably one or the other or something like the platypus God designed to help our fleshbound scientists make fools of themselves. Notice the big-time authority appeal! These souls have credentials from some of the most famous Godless institutions. How could they be wrong?

I like the part about them fulfilling their dreams. Their fondest dream is for intelligent design to disappear, along with the designer and the accountability He requires from the chief creation of His Hands.

God is not mocked; the Tiktaalik rosea doesn't surprise Him. Only a very few thousand years ago, He created the thing some scientists date at three-hundred and seventy-five million years. What a nice ballpark number, rounded to the nearest five million years! Five or ten million is nothing to an evolutionist--just pocket change.

So look at what the big boys and girls discovered for us to debunk during show and tell time! A science museum in South Kensington, England will house a plaster cast of it. Hopefully we won't have any creative sculpting going on.

Tiktaalik (I'll call him a "Tik-tak" for short since the other word is too hard to spell and too hard to swallow)supposedly looks like a fish and an alligator. It lifts its head above the water to breathe. The evolutionists go bonkers over that. Why? The lowly crocodile does the same thing, but nobody makes a big deal out of it. I can't see why this is such a big evolutionary breakthrough, unless this lifting-the-head trick made the denizen of the scum pond start thinking it might become a man. I can imagine another reason why Mr. Tik-tak rubbernecked. Mrs. Tik-tak couldn't tolerate it, either. Those other "sheilas" on the bank may have had that "come hither look" in their crocodilian eyes.

We know the coelecanth went down the tube as the water-to-land missing link. People still catch and eat him. Tik-tak seems like a suitable replacement fossil. If one big lie doesn't reel in the gullible, then change the bait. Tik-tak could play or prey upon the popular imagination for decades if the God haters do it right. They could make sure newspapers all over the world carry the "news" about Tik-tak. They've already done that. Check. Now they will persuade book publishers to put it in our public school science books. That should be easy. No matter if we easily debunk the thing for the fraud it certainly is, the damage will have been done. College texts will also perpetuate the myth. Religion does not go away so easily.

Interestingly, archaeopteryx, "the famous fossil which bridged the gap between reptiles and birds" is cited as an icon of evolution. Evolutionists insist Tik-tak is another such icon. It is a dream come true because they must realize they have no other verifiable transition forms. Archaeopteryx is a famous fraud. They shouldn't even mention it in the same breath with their new toy unless they want sensible people to wake up and smell their latest con.



Sin Again


Here they go again;
Ideas full of bull again;
Tik-tak a delusional sin,
An offense against God.

They flubbed on archaeopteryx,
Coelecanth and other tricks.
They think we're a bunch of hicks?
Methinks I smell a fraud.

Tik-tak is what it is,
Fish or reptile schiz,
Tadpole or big liz--
All anyone can say.

Real bones or plaster cast,
Still alive or didn't last,
Won't we have one big laugh,
To find Tic-tac's DNA?

Piltdown man, and Heidelburg,
Neanderthal, and more absurd,
Will they find a hummingbird,
Becoming an ornithopter?

Evolutionism is a religion
Holding God in derision,
Apoplexed by our decision,
To take all God can offer.

Created to do what it did do well--
No progeny to think,compute or spell,
Or choose the path to Heaven or Hell--
Christ with a word made flesh and bone.


Tik-tak knew to mind its place,
No way akin to the human race.
It won't have to hide its face
In shame before God's throne.



Speculation and imagination aside, what do the evolutionist's have? It doesn't move. It doesn't tell a story. The continuum of other transitional forms are nowhere in sight. Tik-tak requires these if he's to ever stand on his own two feet and be a man. It never happened! Scientists will find many generations of his offspring looking just like him, give or take tiny differences due to natural selection (We can even acknowledge "micro-evolution.")

Intelligent design? Obviously.

Similar design for different creatures? Of course; same Designer.

How long did it take to make everything we see? Six earth days.

Can real scientists really believe this, given all the discoveries of paleontologists and anthropologists? Sure. Thousands of them do and do it strongly.

But what about all the fossil evidence? Creationists and evolutionists have the same evidence to test with their instruments and their senses. Tik-tak belongs to all of us, not just to evolutionists. God created Tik-tak for our use and we will use his bones to glorify the Creator, not to rebel against Him.



The old, old, old story in the same old evolutionist style:



Scientists have made one of the most important fossil finds in history: a missing link between fish and land animals, showing how creatures first walked out of the water and on to dry land more than 375m years ago.

Palaeontologists have said that the find, a crocodile-like animal called the Tiktaalik roseae and described today in the journal Nature, could become an icon of evolution in action - like Archaeopteryx, the famous fossil that bridged the gap between reptiles and birds.

As such, it will be a blow to proponents of intelligent design, who claim that the many gaps in the fossil record show evidence of some higher power. Richard Dawkins, the evolutionary biologist, said: "Our emergence on to the land is one of the more significant rites of passage in our evolutionary history, and Tiktaalik is an important link in the story."

Tiktaalik - the name means "a large, shallow-water fish" in the Inuit language Inuktikuk - shows that the evolution of animals from living in water to living on land happened gradually, with fish first living in shallow water. The animal lived in the Devonian era lasting from 417m to 354m years ago, and had a skull, neck, and ribs similar to early limbed animals (known as tetrapods), as well as a more primitive jaw, fins, and scales akin to fish. The scientists who discovered it say the animal was a predator with sharp teeth, a crocodile-like head, and a body that grew up to 2.75 metres (9ft) long.

"It's very important for a number of reasons, one of which is simply the fact that it's so well-preserved and complete," said Jennifer Clack, a paleontologist at Cambridge University and author of an accompanying article in Nature. Scientists have previously been able to trace the transition of fish into limbed animals only crudely over the millions of years they anticipate the process took place. They suspected that an animal which bridged the gap between fish and land-based tetrapods must have existed - but, until now, there had been scant evidence of one.

"Tiktaalik blurs the boundary between fish and land-living animal both in terms of its anatomy and its way of life," said Neil Shubin, a biologist at the University of Chicago, and a leader of the expedition which found Tiktaalik. The near-pristine fossil was found on Ellesmere Island, Canada, which is 600 miles from the north pole in the Arctic Circle. Scientists from the Academy of Natural Sciences in Philadelphia, the University of Chicago, and Harvard University led several expeditions into the inhospitable icy desert to search for the fossils.
The find is the first complete evidence of an animal that was on the verge of the transition from water to land. "The find is a dream come true," said Ted Daeschler of the Academy of Natural Sciences. "We knew that the rocks on Ellesmere Island offered a glimpse into the right time period and were formed in the right kinds of environments to provide the potential for finding fossils documenting this important evolutionary transition."

When Tiktaalik lived, the Canadian Arctic region was part of a land mass which straddled the equator. Like the Amazon basin today, it had a subtropical climate and the animal lived in small streams. The skeleton indicates that it could support its body under the force of gravity.

Farish Jenkins, an evolutionary biologist at Harvard University said: "This represents a critical early phase in the evolution of all limbed animals, including humans - albeit a very ancient step." Tiktaalik also gives biologists a new understanding of how fins turned into limbs. Its fin contains bones that compare to the upper arm, forearm and primitive parts of the hand of land-living animals.
"Most of the major joints of the fin are functional in this fish," Professor Shubin said. "The shoulder, elbow and even parts of the wrist are already there and working in ways similar to the earliest land-living animals."

Dr Clack said that, judging from the fossil, the first evolutionary transition from sea to land probably involved learning how to breathe air. "Tiktaalik has lost a series of bones that, in fishes, covers the gill region and helps to operate the gill-breathing mechanism," she said. "The air-breathing mechanism it had would have been elaborated and having lost the series of bones that lies between the head and the shoulder girdle means it's got a neck, it can raise its head more easily in order to gulp the air. "The flexible robust limbs appear to be connected with pushing the head out of the water to breathe the air."

H. Richard Lane, director of sedimentary geology and palaeobiology at the US National Science Foundation, said: "These exciting discoveries are providing fossil Rosetta stones for a deeper understanding of this evolutionary milestone - fish to land-roaming tetrapods."

A cast of the fossil goes on display at the Science Museum in South Kensington central London today.

6 Comments:

  • STOP BLOGGING about creationism! Creationism is a blatant lie perpatrated by a deceiving church! VIVA EVOLUTION!

    By Anonymous Anonymous, at 3:19 PM  

  • Thanks for the input, Anonymous. As for "Viva Evolution," I think it has lived long enough to destroy millions of lives. It should definitely die. What is Spanish for Die Evolution? Isn't it "muerto" or something like that?

    Please write back and let me know what you think of the poem.

    D.

    By Blogger Don Daniels, at 6:56 PM  

  • Dear Don,

    I took the link for your important observations on that fossil (T.r.) to my own blog, in my response to an evolution student. I entitled my response as:

    Macroevolution, The Overselling of a Speculation.

    Dear Don,

    Congratulations for your commitment and for your wise comments!

    Here in your blog, as in mine, it is evident that through anonymous and multiple pseudos, the desperate evolutionists are trying to darken the light. However, while we are still here, we won't let that to happen!

    Continue your encouraging work and God bless you!

    Fernando Castro-Chavez, PhD.

    By Blogger fdocc, at 12:12 PM  

  • I got as far as "Archaeopteryx is a famous fraud" before collapsing. Somehow that fact has bypassed two generations of palaeontologists (most of which have better things to do than play any part in the paranoid pageant you seem to experience).

    Ah, it must be nice to have so much privy knowledge! Where we lesser mortals toil for many years, test hypotheses, make and discard theories, you just get spoonfed by a deity. Quite enviable. But I think I 'd rather keep both my integrity and self-respect by doing my fact-finding myself. Good luck with the poems, they are doubtlessly good stress-relievers.

    By Anonymous nectocaris, at 1:59 AM  

  • Thanks Nectocaris (?)

    I appreciate your perusal of Tiktaalik rosea. Sorry that my calling archaeopteryx a famous fraud flummoxed you. At least you read the article up to that point.

    Actually, you have corrected something I forgot to correct shortly after this post was published. I had been reading about archaeoraptor and unwisely mixed up the two names. I meant to identify archaeoraptor as the fraud it is.

    But it seems not everyone is convinced that archaeopteryx passes the sniff test either. It has the avian lungs, hollow bones etc. of a bird (I am told)--only a bird and nothing more. If this is true, then might I not also call the archaeopteryx a famous fraud?

    Sorry to say, evolution is not necessarily a religion based upon pure values. Chicanery pays big, especially in the arena of supposed "missing links/transitional forms. Much money changed hands between the discoverers of ---ryx and museums. We know science should be pure, something totally based upon carefully monitored scientific methods. Not so. Scientists are at least as culpable of errors and dissimulation as clergymen. That is why science makes an even poorer religion. Many scientists rule out God a priori; that leaves us with directionless man prone to fulfilling his own ego.

    Nectocaris, I assume from your comment that you make your living as a scientist. Congratulations. Your testimony about pursuing truth with integrity appeals to me. I would be happy to hear further from you about why you feel archaeopteryx is a transitional form. We should be able to clear this up based upon real data. (I admit that the Internet can give a person a jaundiced view of most anything.)

    My apologies for confusing archaeoraptor and archaeopteryx.

    No paranoia here. I have received the promise of eternal life from the One Who has always existed.

    Not one other world religion, including evolution/humanism, includes fulfilled prophecy about its master, not Buddhism, Islam, Darwinism, or any of them. But the birth, life, death and resurrection of Christ was foretold with hundreds of prophecies about where he would be born, where he came from, the nature of the virgin birth, how much would be offered for his betrayal, and on and on (over 300 details hundreds of years before He came to us). People have set out to disprove his life and ministry and have become Christians instead. Thousands of scientists doing work similar to yours actually believe in a literal six days of creation by an intelligent designer and personal God. You may find several of their professional credentials are at least the equal of your own. Why are they denied a voice in leading scientific publications? Because evolution is the ruling paradigm. That has nothing to do with truth; only with power.

    Thanks for your comments. Please write me again.

    Don D.

    By Blogger Don Daniels, at 3:13 PM  

  • What I find so interesting about the current gaggle of scientists who espouse Evolution as a fact (instead if what it really is: a theory long since discredited by serious scientists) is how SURE they are until another discovery changes their entire dynamic.

    God can not be "proven" by science, but He will never be disproved either.

    Science states something dogmatically-- until the dogma changes.

    Which do you really want to put your faith in?

    As I show on my own Doubt Free Living site, God uses the foolish things of this word to confound the wise. Still holds true today!

    By Anonymous Macy, at 10:10 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home